- From: Michael Kay <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 16:30:48 +0100
- To: "'John Cowan'" <jcowan@reutershealth.com>, "'Rick Jelliffe'" <ricko@allette.com.au>
- Cc: <www-xml-blueberry-comments@w3.org>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
> > > Why not try that minimal solution first, and see if it works? > > > > (And why not do it as a corrigendum rather than 1.1) > > I keep telling you why. Because it changes the definition of > well-formedness. A document like "<foo<NEL>bar=baz> is not WF > XML 1.0, but it is WF XML 1.1. > You could do it without changing the definition of well-formedness by saying that the set of characters considered to be whitespace, and normalized as such, is a property of the encoding. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@ntlworld.com work: Michael.Kay@softwareag.com
Received on Friday, 26 July 2002 11:28:40 UTC