Rick Jelliffe scripsit: > Have the additions needed for supporting Unicode 3.1 now slipped below the level > of "changes that force a version-up"? I don't think so, given that we are still materially changing the definition of WF-ness. -- John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> http://www.reutershealth.com http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Yakka foob mog. Grug pubbawup zink wattoom gazork. Chumble spuzz. -- Calvin, giving Newton's First Law "in his own words"Received on Saturday, 13 July 2002 23:18:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 29 October 2007 16:58:05 GMT