W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-blueberry-comments@w3.org > June 2001

Re: What version of XML?

From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 11:38:16 -0400
Message-ID: <3B38AC68.8040006@reutershealth.com>
To: Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@appcomp.com>
CC: "'www-xml-blueberry-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-blueberry-comments@w3.org>
Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:

> in the xml PI, what will the version attribute be?


We don't know yet.

> I'd suggest version="1.1"


Or version 1.0.1, or use a separate mark and leave the version alone,
or ...


> since version="blueberry" would get confusing fast.
> For that matter, why is this draft called "Blueberry" instead of XML 1.1? or
> XML 1.0 w/ Unicode?


It's a convenient code name that doesn't commit us to a premature
permanent name.

-- 
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2001 11:57:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 12:11:43 GMT