AW: Question to XKMS and XBulk

Hi Stephen,

I am far away from being an XML expert so I may be totally wrong with X509Data.
As far as I understood, X509Data can be used to transport one or more X509 certificates. So this is what I want for my "card verifiable" certificates: a "container" to put my certificates in.
So the question is, if there is something similar to X509Data or X509Certificate where I can put my cvcs in?

Regards

Thomas

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: www-xkms-request@w3.org [mailto:www-xkms-request@w3.org] 
> Im Auftrag von Stephen Farrell
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. Oktober 2006 18:47
> An: Beckmann, Thomas [S229271]
> Cc: www-xkms@w3.org
> Betreff: Re: Question to XKMS and XBulk
> 
> 
> 
> 
> thomas.beckmann@atosorigin.com wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >  
> > I am not really an expert with XML but I am working on a 
> mechanism for 
> > the exchange of certificate managment information, i. e. 
> certification 
> > reply and certification respons. Because we have to do this 
> for quite 
> > a lot of certificates we are to use XBulk.
>  >
> > This works quite wunderful for p10 requests and x.509 certs.
> > The issue is, that we do not produce only x.509 
> certificates but also 
> > card verifiable certificates according to ISO/IEC 
> 7816-8:2004 and CEN 
> > CWA 14890-1.
> > The underlying request is in p10 form, so we can use 
> existing schemas.
> >  
> > But what about cv certificates?
> >  
> > Is it possible to but tem into an existing structure/schema 
> like X509Data?
> > Or do we have to extend the XBulk-definition and, if so, 
> how will this 
> > be done?
> 
> Sounds like you want to use the MessageExtensions field in the schema.
> I'd be surprised if X509Data was correct since this isn't key 
> related data as I understand it.
> 
> Cheers,
> Stephen.
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 26 October 2006 11:27:53 UTC