Here's a naive timestamp extension that I used to try out the xkms extension mechanism - in case you are interested in that option. Regards, Tommy On 2/1/06, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > > > > > Vicente D. Guardiola Buitrago wrote: > > > > Hi Wahaj, > > > > I think you could do this using the <MessageExtension> element (Section > > 3.1.3). > > This element is intended to afford that kind of particular necessities, > > and by > > using it your server will still be usable by any XKMS client. > > > > This is only my thinking, I don't know if someone has afforded this > > problem with > > another idea. > > You could also use the SignatureProperties element [1] in xmlsig. If > the timestamp format you're using is specific to xkms and only of > use to the xkms client then maybe MessageExtensions is better, > but if the format is any way more generic then I'd probably go > for SignatureProperties. > > Cheers, > Stephen. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/#sec-SignatureProperties > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:25 GMT