Re: WSDL 1.1 for XKMS note

Hi Rich,

Thanks for your hard work and the files. I fixed some few broken 
XHTML issues and uploaded them to our server[1].

Some questions:

1. Shouldn't the title of the document be:
   "WSDL 1.1 Profile for XKMS"

   "Profile", "Description"  or the usual term for this WSDL 
    characterization.

2.  Shouldn't there be some additional context, for example reminding
   people that the XKMS Spec. doesn't provide any resource discovery mechanism
   to tell which options it actually supports. Then say this could
   be done with WSDL and that here's a first version of an XKMS service
   description with WSDL 1.1.

   This was mentioned in [2], p. 352a.

In the meantime, I'll take care of the other publication details that need
to be done according to the process document. I'll tell you later
where we will able to publish the WSDL XKMS wsdl file. All is ok :)

Thanks!

-jose

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/xkms-wsdl/
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xkms2/