(FYI) World Wide Web Consortium Issues XML Key Management System (XKMS) 2.0 as a W3C Recommendation
(FYI) XKMS WG Charter extended until Sep 2005
[Fwd: [Announce] XML-Security C++ 1.2 released]
[Issue 337-phb] Invalid Web Service definition
[Issue 338-tl-1]: Typo in the description of SOAP body
[Issue 338-tl-2] Typo redundant ;
[Issue 339-ml] Use of XKMS inside a SOAP 1.2 message
[Issue 340-ml] Namespaces Inclusions
[Issue 341-ml] Inconsistent definition of RespondWith...
[Issue 342-ml] Improper XML in response examples
[Issue 344-ml] Use of terms, RFC[2110], clarity in Sec. 3.2.3[102]
[Issue 344-ml] XKMS Schema issue: RequestAbstractType...
[Issue 345-ml] Namespace Inclusions
[Issue 346-ml] RSAKeyPair Schema
[mlong@mvsquared.net: Re: [Issue 340-ml] Namespaces Inclusions]
[www-xkms] <none>
Any examples of actual XKMS applications?
Debriefing teleconf for tuesday 5 June?
Editorial in Part-2
Issue + Proposal (Section 3.2.3)
Namespace Inclusions
Promotion opportunity for XKMS 2.0: Member testimonials
Questions reg. XKMS spec
Schema Issue
Semantic Nit
some quick questions regarding XKMS
the four (rather one) last remaining open issue
Last message date: Thursday, 30 June 2005 19:49:23 UTC