Hi David, Thanks for your message. You're right and I added an errata to the Errata document[1]. -jose On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:58:32PM +0200, David Mas wrote: > > The point [207] still contains a reference to AssertionType, which I > assume has been otherwise removed. I think it should be removed since it > does not appear anywhere else. > > '[207]The following schema defines the <Status> element and StatusType > and AssertionType types:' > > Should read instead: > '[207]The following schema defines the <Status> element and StatusType > type:' > [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/06/xkms2-errata.html#entry-12Received on Thursday, 15 December 2005 15:33:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 14:31:05 GMT