Hi folks, I'm at a loss at evaluating whether the following two erratas have been accepted or not. Thanks for your help, -jose On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:19:52AM +1000, Manger, James H wrote: Errata 1: > XML-Signature formats X.509 distinguished names (DNs) according to RFC 2253 "LDAP (v3): UTF-8 representation of distinguished names". XKMS should use the same format. > > XMKS 2.0 uses the following text as DNs in paragraphs 186, 243, 246 & 252: > > C="UK" O="CryptoGuys Ltd." CN="Bob" > C="US" O="Alice Corp" CN="Alice Aardvark" > C="UK" O="Bob Corp" CN="Bob Baker" > > The text for these DNs should be: > > CN=Bob,O=CryptoGuys Ltd.,C=UK > CN=Alice Aardvark,O=Alice Corp,C=US > CN=Bob Baker,O=Bob Corp,C=UK Errata 2: > XKMS should explicitly state that the RFC 2253 is the format used for the <UseKeyWith> Identifier attribute (when the Application attribute is urn:ietf:rfc:2459). Paragraph 186 in section 5.1.3 "Element <UseKeyWith>" is the appropriate place. >Received on Thursday, 15 December 2005 10:42:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:25 GMT