Hi, Thanks for the link correction Guillermo. I updated it in both part-1 and part-2. -jose On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 01:33:14PM +0100, Guillermo ?lvaro Rey wrote: > > Link to RFC2119 (in paragraph [392]) links in fact to a different one > (RFC2118).Received on Monday, 25 April 2005 12:16:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:24 GMT