Tommy, On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:36:30PM +0100, Tommy Lindberg wrote: > Yes you are right, my intention was to, not allow RespondWith Thanks for the clarification. I propose to reword [128a] as follows: <quote> [128a]The RespondWith element MUST NOT be a child of a CompoundRequest element. Each request that is encapsulated inside a CompoundRequest element may or may not have its own RespondWith element child, as needed. </quote> How does it reads now? -joseReceived on Tuesday, 12 April 2005 10:29:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:24 GMT