Re: [bug?] Re: Issue 332-tl6: Use of RespondWith

Tommy,

On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:36:30PM +0100, Tommy Lindberg wrote:
> Yes you are right, my intention was to, not allow RespondWith 

Thanks for the clarification.

I propose to reword [128a] as follows:

<quote>
[128a]The RespondWith element MUST NOT be a child of a CompoundRequest
element. Each request that is encapsulated inside a CompoundRequest
element may or may not have its own RespondWith element child, as needed.
</quote>

How does it reads now?

-jose