Hi Tommy and all, I had pointed out this issue but found no response. I agree with you that either the schema should be updated to allow PendingRequests in a CompoundRequest or that the sentece should be removed from the specification. My client currently follows the schema but changes could be done if the schema was going to be modified. Regards, - -Guillermo El mar, 28-09-2004 a las 12:23, Tommy Lindberg escribi: > In the process of trying to get my head around the compound messaging > and I discovered what I believe is an inconsistency in the spec. > > The last senctence in Section 2.8, which goes like this: > > "Alternatively a client MAY issue a compound request containing > multiple inner pending requests corresponding to requests which were > originally made independently." > > is in conflict with both the schema and also with text elsewhere in > the spec - PendingRequests's are not allowed in a CompoundRequest. > > If this feature is required then the schema needs to be updated > otherwise we'll get away with removing the offending sentence. > > Regards > Tommy >Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2004 13:24:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 14:31:01 GMT