W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms@w3.org > October 2004

Re: Asynchronous test cases

From: Guillermo Álvaro Rey <alvarorg@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:59:05 +0100
To: Tommy Lindberg <tommy.lindberg@gmail.com>
Cc: www-xkms@w3.org
Message-Id: <1098197945.22905.37.camel@lamb.dsg.cs.tcd.ie>
> Could we make the message sequences in the asynchronous test cases
> consistent between T7, T8, T11, T12 so that all of them use
> StatusRequest's the way T7 does?

Hi Tommy, all,

Yes, I think so. I was talking before with Jose and if nobody disagrees
I will write a new paragraph in the Test Collection site stating the way
the completion of the response is triggered by a StatusRequest in these
tests. And then I will also add the needed StatusRequests in T8, T11 &
T12.

+
We were also planning to update the numeration of the tests, being
XKISS-Tn and XKRSS-Tn instead of Tn and T10n, if nobody has any
objection.

+
Before we finally agree on Yunhao's revised XKRSS test cases, we were
thinking of defining all of them synchronous, and then later define the
same scenarios but asynchronous, for consistency.

+
I would like to be sure that the new Test Cases are going to be used
finally before mapping the assertions to the scenarios. By the way, for
new scenario contributions it would be very handy if you could report
which assertions are being covered. :) And also the sample messages
would be nice. :))

Cheers!
 - -Guillermo
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2004 14:59:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:23 GMT