W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms@w3.org > October 2004

Re: Action item

From: Tommy Lindberg <tommy.lindberg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:50:02 +0100
Message-ID: <18ec59cc041012055078e61dcd@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yunhao Zhang <yzhang@sqldata.com>
Cc: www-xkms@w3.org

That's it, Yunhao.

Tommy


On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 08:24:42 -0400, Yunhao Zhang <yzhang@sqldata.com> wrote:
> Hi Tommy,
> 
> Thanks for the insider information. I am still getting a failure with out
> the KeyName. The request message is something like,
> 
> <SOAP-ENV:Envelope
> xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
> xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#">
> - <SOAP-ENV:Body>
> - <xkms:LocateRequest xmlns:xkms="http://www.w3.org/2002/03/xkms#"
> Id="_ce8734ab-cf09-40f0-813e-aea6aa889015"
> Service="http://62.77.172.83:4080/xkiss/soap11">
>   <xkms:RespondWith>xkms:KeyName</xkms:RespondWith>
>   <xkms:RespondWith>xkms:KeyValue</xkms:RespondWith>
>   <xkms:RespondWith>xkms:X509Cert</xkms:RespondWith>
> - <xkms:QueryKeyBinding xmlns:xkms="http://www.w3.org/2002/03/xkms#"
> Id="_dd53968f-b75d-4984-bf64-857d4bc23134">
>   <KeyInfo xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#" />
>   <xkms:KeyUsage>xkms:Signature</xkms:KeyUsage>
>   <xkms:KeyUsage>xkms:Encryption</xkms:KeyUsage>
>   <xkms:KeyUsage>xkms:Exchange</xkms:KeyUsage>
>   <xkms:UseKeyWith Application="urn:ietf:rfc:2633"
> Identifier="bob@example.com" />
>   <xkms:TimeInstant Time="2004-10-12T12:50:09Z" />
>   </xkms:QueryKeyBinding>
>   </xkms:LocateRequest>
>   </SOAP-ENV:Body>
>   </SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
> 
> I suspect the empty KeyInfo caused the problem, is it true?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Yunhao
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tommy Lindberg" <tommy.lindberg@gmail.com>
> To: "Yunhao Zhang" <yzhang@sqldata.com>
> Cc: <www-xkms@w3.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 5:16 AM
> Subject: Re: Action item
> 
> >
> > Hi Yunhao -
> >
> > > Yes. I can reconfirm your claim,
> >
> > Glad to hear that, thanks.
> >
> > > I got a failure ...
> >
> > I checked out your request; if I am not mistaken, you specify a sequence
> of
> > <KeyInfo><KeyName>Bob</KeyName></KeyInfo>. You don't need to do that.
> > The Locate operation will work just fine with UseKeyWith alone.
> >
> > Regards
> > Tommy
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 19:43:57 -0400, Yunhao Zhang <yzhang@sqldata.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > A quick note to confirm that I have implemented the asynchronous
> > > > behaviour required by test case T7 as outlined in the original e-mail
> > > > below.
> > > >
> > > Yes. I can reconfirm your claim, although I got a failure for the final
> > > results, which was caused by my tool for not providing a correct KeyName
> in
> > > the request message. BTW, I wonder if we should define the KeyName to be
> > > used in all the test cases if it is required. So far, each
> implementation
> > > requires a different KeyName, and it is hard to automate the tests.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Yunhao
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> 
>
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2004 12:50:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:23 GMT