W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms@w3.org > October 2004

Re: Action item

From: Yunhao Zhang <yzhang@sqldata.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 08:24:42 -0400
Message-ID: <001801c4b056$743e4310$6422fecc@sqldata.com>
To: "Tommy Lindberg" <tommy.lindberg@gmail.com>
Cc: <www-xkms@w3.org>

Hi Tommy,

Thanks for the insider information. I am still getting a failure with out
the KeyName. The request message is something like,

<SOAP-ENV:Envelope
xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#">
- <SOAP-ENV:Body>
- <xkms:LocateRequest xmlns:xkms="http://www.w3.org/2002/03/xkms#"
Id="_ce8734ab-cf09-40f0-813e-aea6aa889015"
Service="http://62.77.172.83:4080/xkiss/soap11">
  <xkms:RespondWith>xkms:KeyName</xkms:RespondWith>
  <xkms:RespondWith>xkms:KeyValue</xkms:RespondWith>
  <xkms:RespondWith>xkms:X509Cert</xkms:RespondWith>
- <xkms:QueryKeyBinding xmlns:xkms="http://www.w3.org/2002/03/xkms#"
Id="_dd53968f-b75d-4984-bf64-857d4bc23134">
  <KeyInfo xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#" />
  <xkms:KeyUsage>xkms:Signature</xkms:KeyUsage>
  <xkms:KeyUsage>xkms:Encryption</xkms:KeyUsage>
  <xkms:KeyUsage>xkms:Exchange</xkms:KeyUsage>
  <xkms:UseKeyWith Application="urn:ietf:rfc:2633"
Identifier="bob@example.com" />
  <xkms:TimeInstant Time="2004-10-12T12:50:09Z" />
  </xkms:QueryKeyBinding>
  </xkms:LocateRequest>
  </SOAP-ENV:Body>
  </SOAP-ENV:Envelope>

I suspect the empty KeyInfo caused the problem, is it true?

Thanks,

Yunhao



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tommy Lindberg" <tommy.lindberg@gmail.com>
To: "Yunhao Zhang" <yzhang@sqldata.com>
Cc: <www-xkms@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 5:16 AM
Subject: Re: Action item


>
> Hi Yunhao -
>
> > Yes. I can reconfirm your claim,
>
> Glad to hear that, thanks.
>
> > I got a failure ...
>
> I checked out your request; if I am not mistaken, you specify a sequence
of
> <KeyInfo><KeyName>Bob</KeyName></KeyInfo>. You don't need to do that.
> The Locate operation will work just fine with UseKeyWith alone.
>
> Regards
> Tommy
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 19:43:57 -0400, Yunhao Zhang <yzhang@sqldata.com>
wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > A quick note to confirm that I have implemented the asynchronous
> > > behaviour required by test case T7 as outlined in the original e-mail
> > > below.
> > >
> > Yes. I can reconfirm your claim, although I got a failure for the final
> > results, which was caused by my tool for not providing a correct KeyName
in
> > the request message. BTW, I wonder if we should define the KeyName to be
> > used in all the test cases if it is required. So far, each
implementation
> > requires a different KeyName, and it is hard to automate the tests.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Yunhao
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2004 12:31:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:23 GMT