W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms@w3.org > June 2004

Re: XKMS charter extension draft: fyi and feedback

From: Guillermo Álvaro Rey <alvarorg@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:49:04 +0100
To: jose.kahan@w3.org
Cc: www-xkms@w3.org
Message-Id: <1088099344.26463.186.camel@lamb.dsg.cs.tcd.ie>

Hello Jose and all,

For me, as a developer, the October deadline sounds OK. I'll do my best
during these next three months =)

Cheers,

 - -Guillermo



El jue, 24-06-2004 a las 17:35, Jose Kahan escribió:
> Hello, 
> 
> As I've briefly told you yesterday, I'm preparing the request 
> the extension of our charter. The updated charter draft
> is available at [5]. The changes I've made concern the milestones 
> and the Current Patent Policy.
> 
> Feedback is welcome. If I don't hear from you by Wed. 30th (next week)
> I will assume you agree with the proposal (but I'd like to hear so 
> from you nevertheless).
> 
> Thanks for your time!
> 
> -jose
> 
> --- Milestones
> 
> I took into account the end of the CR period in early October 2004, as
> discussed early in this year.
> 
> October 2004: End of CR period , completion of the interoperability
>        matrix, request for PR.
> 
> Early November 2004: PR
> 
> February 2005: Request for Rec and Rec
> 
> I'd like to hear from Guillermo, the WG members and the developers who
> are participating in the interop, if the October deadline is still
> realistic. If we can make it, then we can have the PR by early November.
> 
> Beyond the middle of November and up to some time in December will be
> very busy period at W3C because of the preparation for the AC 
> meeting and W3C's 10th anniversary. Estimation of publication dates 
> beyond early November will be hard to estimate.
> 
> It would be preferable if we make the October deadline.
> 
> -- Patent Policy
>  
> The XKMS WG has been following the Current Patent Policy (CPP), as
> described in its current charter[1]. Since 15 February 2004, the 
> CPP has been amended [2] and all WG's who were covered under i
> the CPP have to adopt these amendments[3].
> 
> The amendments concern the following:
> 
>  - Definition of the "Royality-Free Licence" definition[4]
>  - The disclosure rules
>  - The PAG procedures
>  - The definition of "Essential Claims"
> 
> I've updated the Patent Policy section of the charter accordingly. I may
> need to change some of the info on how to make disclosures, but 
> am not sure right now about the exact wording.
> 
> Please send mail if someone is uncomfortable with these changes.
> 
> ---
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/2003/06/charter.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/05-pp-transition.html
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/05-pp-transition.html#general
> [4] 
> http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Requirements
> [5] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/2004/06/charter.html
> 
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2004 13:49:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:31:42 UTC