Hello XKMS Working group,

 

I finished my diploma thesis about XKMS in March 2004. In the end of February 2004, I have posted security improvements to your working group, but I have never got feedback.

 

Attached you will find the document describing the improvements. I have to admit that the first two improvements 5.4.1 and 5.4.2 are not so important, but please check at least 5.4.3

 

Thanks a million,

 ! ;

Jan Brink

 

From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker@verisign.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:57:10 -0800
Message-ID: <C6DDA43B91BFDA49AA2F1E473732113E0A18EB@mou1wnexm05.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
To: "'janni81@web.de'" <janni81@web.de>, "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
Cc: www-xkms@w3.org 
Thank !
 you, I will take a look and get back to you.-----Original Message-----
From: janni81@web.de [mailto:janni81@web.de]Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 1:26 PMTo: pbaker@verisign.comCc: www-xkms@w3.org; janni81@web.deSubject: Dear XKMS-WG, I am evaluating XKMS 2.0 in my diploma thesis. I have probably discovered some discrepancies and security improvements forXKMS 2, described in the attached file.  I would be glad if you can provide me feedback on my findings; especiallybecause it is an essential part of my thesis. Each feedback is a great help.  Please let me know if you are able to provide feedback by March 08 becauseof the deadlineof my thesis. I really like the concept of XKMS and think that it has a good future tobecome a widely accepted standard.  ByeJan Brink


Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS!  
Jetzt neu bei WEB.DE FreeMail: http://freemail.web.de/?mc=021193