RE: Enumerations in schema

> I beleive that the spec is correct as currently specified, but
> Qnames are a schema feature that need to be depricated so it
> would be useful to move to URIs if that is viable.

Yes, the spec is correct.  I was wrong when I agreed with the belief
that it was wrong. :)  (It's correct because Schema validation happens
after the validator expands the qname, and compares that expansion to
the list of expanded enumerations that it maintains.)  And yes, I think
we should move to URI's.  After all, WS-Sec did it late in the game, so
I think we can do it, too. :)

--
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview      http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html