Comment on Schema PER

This is to acknowledge and thank you for your comment ([1] forwarded to us at
[2]), which we believe requires no further action on our behalf.

> As I understand, the PER is basically the errata merged into the 1st 
> edition schema documents.  Is that correct?

That is correct.

On behalf of the Schema WG, 

-- Mary 
   Holstege@mathling.com

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xkms/2004Mar/0024.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2004AprJun/0003.html