W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms@w3.org > July 2004

RE: XKMS charter extension draft: fyi and feedback

From: tommy lindberg <lindberg_tommy@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:00:57 +0000
To: jose.kahan@w3.org
Cc: www-xkms@w3.org
Message-ID: <BAY12-F87BFSRXD0bzZ0000c085@hotmail.com>

Jose -

>if the October deadline is still realistic.

Belatedly; yes, this is realistic.

Tommy

>From: Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org>
>Reply-To: jose.kahan@w3.org
>To: www-xkms@w3.org
>Subject: XKMS charter extension draft: fyi and feedback
>Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:35:05 +0200
>
>
>Hello,
>
>As I've briefly told you yesterday, I'm preparing the request
>the extension of our charter. The updated charter draft
>is available at [5]. The changes I've made concern the milestones
>and the Current Patent Policy.
>
>Feedback is welcome. If I don't hear from you by Wed. 30th (next week)
>I will assume you agree with the proposal (but I'd like to hear so
>from you nevertheless).
>
>Thanks for your time!
>
>-jose
>
>--- Milestones
>
>I took into account the end of the CR period in early October 2004, as
>discussed early in this year.
>
>October 2004: End of CR period , completion of the interoperability
>        matrix, request for PR.
>
>Early November 2004: PR
>
>February 2005: Request for Rec and Rec
>
>I'd like to hear from Guillermo, the WG members and the developers who
>are participating in the interop, if the October deadline is still
>realistic. If we can make it, then we can have the PR by early November.
>
>Beyond the middle of November and up to some time in December will be
>very busy period at W3C because of the preparation for the AC
>meeting and W3C's 10th anniversary. Estimation of publication dates
>beyond early November will be hard to estimate.
>
>It would be preferable if we make the October deadline.
>
>-- Patent Policy
>
>The XKMS WG has been following the Current Patent Policy (CPP), as
>described in its current charter[1]. Since 15 February 2004, the
>CPP has been amended [2] and all WG's who were covered under i
>the CPP have to adopt these amendments[3].
>
>The amendments concern the following:
>
>  - Definition of the "Royality-Free Licence" definition[4]
>  - The disclosure rules
>  - The PAG procedures
>  - The definition of "Essential Claims"
>
>I've updated the Patent Policy section of the charter accordingly. I may
>need to change some of the info on how to make disclosures, but
>am not sure right now about the exact wording.
>
>Please send mail if someone is uncomfortable with these changes.
>
>---
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/2003/06/charter.html
>[2] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/05-pp-transition.html
>[3] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/05-pp-transition.html#general
>[4]
>http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Requirements
>[5] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/2004/06/charter.html
>

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
Received on Thursday, 1 July 2004 12:01:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:22 GMT