El lun, 06-12-2004 a las 00:14, Tommy Lindberg escribi: > How is the shared secret "holder" in an NotBoundAuthentication intended to be > identified? Hi Tommy, I would say that the key name could be specified in the KeyInfo element in the PrototypeKeyBinding, avoiding the need for a change in the schema regarding NotBoundAuthentication. Regards, - -Guillermo > Apart from altering the schema (adding a "Name" attribute) the only > reasonable option seems to be, to combine these two pieces of > information and include their base64 encoding in the Value attribute. > > For example, a protocol defined out of scope to XKMS and identified by the URI > urn:example-protocol:username-password specifies that the Value > attribute carries > a username/password pair separated by a ':' would take the form of > the following > instance fragment > > <NotBoundAuthentication > Protocol="urn:example-protocol:username-password" > Value="YWxpY2U6c2VjcmV0"/> > > Regards > TommyReceived on Monday, 6 December 2004 13:36:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 14:31:02 GMT