Re: Draft minutes from the 30/03/2004 XKMS teleconf

Hello Rich,

Thanks for your time doing this.

On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 02:52:04PM -0500, Rich Salz wrote:
> Jose Kahan wrote:
> 
> As I understand, the PER is basically the errata merged into the 1st 
> edition schema documents.  Is that correct?

Yes. I checked with Michael.

> I read the complete errata.  While there is lots of discussion on base64 
> canonical form (no whitespace), and the open-interval nature of dates 
> and timestamps, I could find nothing in the errata document that would 
> be an issue for XKMS.

That's great!

I sent your reply to the PER mailing list on behalf of the XKMS
WG.

We're all set!

Thanks again!

-jose