Comments on 26 March draft

Hi Phill,
 
Here are a few editorial comments on the 26 March draft.
 
- cheers,
  Roland Lockhart, Entrust
 
Part I
------
 
para 65: In the description of the Id attribute, should probably say
"originator" rather than "requestor" since the message in question could be
either a request or response.
 
para 68: Implies that Exclusive XML Canonicalization is optional, which I
believe disagrees with para 491.
 
para 82: The description of xkms:X509Chain says "private key". I believe
this should be "certificates"?
 
para 94: Indicates that <Result> is returned iff the service cannot return a
more specific result. Is this true? It seems to me that this element is part
of all response messages.
 
para 134: Should remove "Multiple" from sample request, 7th line down (a
vestige from previous drafts).
 
 
Part II
-------
 
para 67, item # 4: This disagrees with para 411 in Part I.