W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms@w3.org > February 2003

FW: current editing status

From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker@verisign.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 09:19:34 -0800
Message-ID: <CE541259607DE94CA2A23816FB49F4A3F7029E@vhqpostal6.verisign.com>
To: "Www-Xkms (E-mail)" <www-xkms@w3.org>
 Just so folk know where we are as of 11:46 am EST today.
 


Issue #	 Owner	 Action Requested	 Status	
71	 Phillip Hallam-Baker	 Conformance is still open. Phill has
consolidated all conformance(s) to one place	 In progress	
25	 Phillip Hallam-Baker	 Still open (see
<http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS20021017/xkms-issues-list.html>
Issues list)	 Tick - See Request Signature	
30	 Phillip Hallam-Baker	 Sent <UseKeyWith> details to the
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xkms/2002Dec/0046.html> list.
JR suggests to add clarification on what kind of policy we exactly mean
- key issuance policy or key usage policy	 Tick- See UseKeyWith	
84	 Phillip Hallam-Baker	 Add text as indicated in the
<http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS20021017/xkms-issues-list.html>
Issues list	 Tick - see UseKeyWith	
74	 Phillip Hallam-Baker	 Still open (see
<http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS20021017/xkms-issues-list.html>
Issues list)	 Tick see Section 2	
79	 Phillip Hallam-Baker	 Still open (see
<http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS20021017/xkms-issues-list.html>
Issues list) - Added mecahnism to the Spec - check Conformance section
Added comment into UseKeyWith section	
96	 Phillip Hallam-Baker	 Still open (see
<http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS20021017/xkms-issues-list.html>
Issues list) - Removed this	 Tick	
108	 Phillip Hallam-Baker	 Still open (see
<http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS20021017/xkms-issues-list.html>
Issues list)	 Tick	
57	 Phillip Hallam-Baker	 Still open (see
<http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS20021017/xkms-issues-list.html>
Issues list) - New Action - Merlin to send Text to List and Phill
Text from Merlin	
123 and 64	 Phillip Hallam-Baker	 Phill has addressed these
issues and sent comments to the list.. JR to see if they address all of
his issues. (see
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xkms/2002Dec/0005.html> email
). See Ed Simon's
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xkms/2002Dec/0040.html> email
on C14N. New Action - Phill/JR to check if
<http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Minutes/see%20Dec%2011%20email> JRs
proposal has been rolled into the spec	 Check with JR	
114 and 115	 Phillip Hallam-Baker	 New issues added to in response
to Merlin's
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xkms/2002Dec/0047.html> email
on Status Query	 In Progress	
	Phillip Hallam-Baker	 Address Merlin and Slava's comments on
the list	 Done, Other issues raised	
	Phillip Hallam-Baker	 Send note to the list regarding not
needing KeyAgreement in XKMS but a definition of AbstractElement which
can be extended and used to support similar method.	 Done	
	Phillip Hallam-Baker, Frederick Hirsch, Mike Just
Continue working on confirmation of resolution.	 Still Open	

All other issues are done



Received on Monday, 3 February 2003 12:19:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:31:40 UTC