W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms@w3.org > December 2003

RE: Moving to CR: Status of implementations

From: Sebastien Pouliot <spouliot@motus.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:27:44 -0500
To: <jose.kahan@w3.org>, <www-xkms@w3.org>
Message-ID: <MOECILGKHDIOPDMPBPNPAEKICHAA.spouliot@motus.com>

Jose,

> If Poupou is dead, I propose we remove the link.

Poupou is not dead - at least not yet ;-). However his XKMS 1.0
implementation has been offline for quite some time.

> Does anyone else has other implementations that we should quote
> there?

Sadly I'm too busy with other projects to implement XKMS v2 right now.

P.S. you can remove the link.
----------------------------------------
Sebastien Pouliot
Architecte Securite / Security Architect
Motus Technologies
tel: 418 521 2100 ext 225
fax: 418 521 2101
courriel / email: spouliot@motus.com

-----Original Message-----
From: www-xkms-request@w3.org [mailto:www-xkms-request@w3.org]On Behalf
Of Jose Kahan
Sent: 9 decembre, 2003 13:17
To: www-xkms@w3.org
Subject: Moving to CR: Status of implementations



Dear all,

I just went thru the Public Code & Tookits section in our home page
[1]. I was wondering how close are those implementations to XKMS 2.0,
as some of those pages look old:

  Verisign: April 2003 (hopefully up to date!)
  Microsoft: January 2002
  Entrust: 2000 or 2001
  Poupuo: broken link (still alive).

If the Microsoft and Entrust implementations are old, does anyone
know if they intend to update them as we're moving to CR pretty soon?

Does anyone else has other implementations that we should quote
there?

If Poupou is dead, I propose we remove the link.

Thanks!

-jose (and this is the last mail of this series)

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/#Code
Received on Tuesday, 9 December 2003 13:29:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:21 GMT