W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms@w3.org > October 2002

RE: ISSUE # 49

From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker@verisign.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:38:21 -0700
Message-ID: <2F3EC696EAEED311BB2D009027C3F4F40ECA63CE@vhqpostal.verisign.com>
To: reagle@w3.org, "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>, "Www-Xkms (E-mail)" <www-xkms@w3.org>

yes, there is another chunk o text to go in that defines the policy
identifier. Issue 49 was more narrowly defined.

		Phill

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joseph Reagle [mailto:reagle@w3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:12 PM
> To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip; Www-Xkms (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: ISSUE # 49
> 
> 
> On Wednesday 16 October 2002 01:28 pm, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
> >   This is the issue of specifying how the policy identifier is
> > calculated...
> 
> Is your summary of the text correct? The policy identifier 
> can be any value 
> chosen  by the XKMS service, right?
> 
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 16:36:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:31:40 UTC