W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms@w3.org > October 2002

RE: Issue 33... keybinding discuss...

From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker@verisign.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:29:59 -0700
Message-ID: <2F3EC696EAEED311BB2D009027C3F4F40ECA63CB@vhqpostal.verisign.com>
To: reagle@w3.org, "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>, "Www-Xkms (E-mail)" <www-xkms@w3.org>

The stoopid client is not supposed to know anything. That is kinda why it is
tricky.

If the keybinding is a proxy for data in an underlying PKI then there should
be certain behaviors defined by the underlying PKI that impact the key
binding.

But the stoopid client does not even know whether the keybinding reflects
the underlying PKI...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joseph Reagle [mailto:reagle@w3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:14 PM
> To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip; Www-Xkms (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Issue 33... keybinding discuss...
> 
> 
> On Wednesday 16 October 2002 02:23 pm, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
> > So if a key binding is reflecting the status of an X.509 
> cert and the
> > cert is revoked by any means then the key binding is automatically
> > revoked.
> 
> How is the stupid XML client supposed to know this? Or is this some 
> requirement on a service?
> 
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 16:28:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:31:40 UTC