RE: requirements comment...

Hi Stephen,

Could you please convey our appreciation to the anonymous commentator for
their comment.  We believe that we've added text to Section 1 that resolves
this issue [1] (cf. second paragraph in this section).

Mike

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/xkms-req.html 

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Farrell [mailto:stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:10 AM
To: www-xkms@w3.org
Subject: requirements comment...



Hi All,

I've received a comment on the requirements that I summarize 
as:

"The requirements document should provide more guidance
on when xkms is applicable, in particular when compared
to PKI protocols developed by PKIX (e.g. OSCP)."

The commentator prefers not to get involved in the 
discussion directly (though isn't mysterious either:-),
Stephen.




-- 
____________________________________________________________
Stephen Farrell         				   
Baltimore Technologies,   tel: (direct line) +353 1 881 6716
39 Parkgate Street,                     fax: +353 1 881 7000
Dublin 8.                mailto:stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie
Ireland                             http://www.baltimore.com