On Monday 06 May 2002 21:16, Shivaram Mysore wrote: > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Minutes/20020423-f2f2-draft-minutes.html Great minutes! Some comments. Issue 1: Will policy URI be explicit or implicit in requests? * Policy binding should be established out-of-band. No way to view policy via XKMS. * Assertion: Delegate this issue out of scope. Up to user. I'll note that I find this acceptable as long as we have somewhere where this can be represented. (I'd advocate a "From" field since this will then be part of the signature if it is signed.) It was mentioned, though I'm not sure it's in the minutes, that it could be in the WSDL. If people feel this way, then I'd like to make sure we communicate this requirement to that WG. Also, we need to reflect in the spec that the meaning of one of the "validates" is unspecified given its absense. Issue 8: QNames * Source: Reagle * Resolution: ??? We will continue to use them unless otherwise instructed by the TAG. (The TAG has accepted this issue [1].) [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#qnameAsId-18Received on Monday, 20 May 2002 18:14:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 14:30:51 GMT