On Thursday 09 May 2002 05:35, Blair Dillaway wrote: > My understanding is that a W3C spec process is that you can't include > dependencies on anything less advanced. That's the general case for RECs, but I don't think it's absolutely necessary for CR. But then again, when in CR if a dependency substantively changed that affected our own syntax or processing behaviour we should use a new namesapce -- which is easily enough done! For what it's worth, yesterday Fallside announced that (I think) the WG's internal issue list is pretty much closed and they hope to issue a Last Call ASAP. -- *Note: I will be attending the W3C AC and WWW2002 meetings from May 5-10, and taking holiday from 13-16. I will not be as responsive during the former period, and off-line during the latter. I will fully respond to any email as soon as possible after my return.Received on Thursday, 9 May 2002 14:12:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 14:30:51 GMT