W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms@w3.org > June 2002

RE: 2.0 Draft 7

From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker@verisign.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 11:11:40 -0700
Message-ID: <2F3EC696EAEED311BB2D009027C3F4F405869B02@vhqpostal.verisign.com>
To: "'Yassir Elley'" <yassir.elley@sun.com>, "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
Cc: "Www-Xkms (E-mail)" <www-xkms@w3.org>

The spec is in output.html
The file source.html is the file to edit if you want to make changes
MiniSource is a test file for testing the ToC generator

I will work on getting a summary of the changes put together. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yassir Elley [mailto:yassir.elley@sun.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:03 PM
> To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
> Cc: Www-Xkms (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: 2.0 Draft 7
> 
> 
> Hi Phil,
> 
> There are a bunch of files in the TestData zip file that you provided.
> Could you let us know exactly which file(s) we should be looking at.
> For example, there are three html files in the top-level directory.
> 
> I am working on my action item from the last F2F (redesigning 
> the Request/Response
> message formats - especially KeyBindingType) and need to know 
> which version of
> the spec/schema to work from.
> 
> Also, I think we had said at the last F2F that, when a spec 
> is revised, the author should
> indicate which issues (from the meeting minutes and 
> otherwise) he thinks are now
> closed. It would be better to be explicit as to what changes 
> are in the new spec rather
> than just saying "I went through the meeting minutes and made 
> the changes listed."
> This would allow the person that raised the issue to be clear 
> that you believe you
> have resolved their issue, allowing them to appropriately 
> provide feedback.
> 
> Thanks,
> Yassir.
> 
> "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" wrote:
> 
> > Here is the latest draft.
> >
> > I went through the meeting minutes and made the changes listed.
> >
> > The other major change is that the schema is now included 
> into the text
> > automatically so problems with synchronising the draft and 
> schema should
> > have been eliminated.
> >
> > I swapped section 2 and 3 since it is more logical that way.
> >
> > I did not manage to get my code going to generate new examples.
> >
> > I did however make one minor change to the schema while 
> writing the code, I
> > changed Private to PrivateKey in order to avoid C# reserved 
> name conflicts.
> >
> >                 Phill
> >
> >   
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------
> >                    Name: TestData.zip
> >    TestData.zip    Type: Zip Compressed Data 
> (application/x-zip-compressed)
> >                Encoding: base64
> 
Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2002 14:10:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:16 GMT