W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms-ws@w3.org > November 2001

Re: XKMS 2.0 base working draft

From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:52:35 +0000
Message-ID: <3BFBF7F3.964B67F@baltimore.ie>
To: Krishna Sankar <ksankar@cisco.com>
CC: www-xkms-ws@w3c.org


(I was talking about the timing of the specs.)

I guess I would tend towards the more self-contained approach - something 
like specifying use of xmldsig and xmlenc "directly" for xkms where 
we need message level protection (and perhaps tls/ssl where we don't). 

>         As another point, my hope is that by the time we are ready with our final
> version, SOAP security would be far enough for us to use it. 

I seem to recall Blair making a comment that made me think the 
opposite on the conference call last week (Blair?).


Stephen Farrell         				   
Baltimore Technologies,   tel: (direct line) +353 1 881 6716
39 Parkgate Street,                     fax: +353 1 881 7000
Dublin 8.                mailto:stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie
Ireland                             http://www.baltimore.com
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2001 13:52:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:48:00 UTC