W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms-ws@w3.org > November 2001

RE: XKMS requirements - initial draft

From: Mike Just <Mike.Just@entrust.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:06:08 -0500
Message-ID: <9A4F653B0A375841AC75A8D17712B9C980F563@sottmxs04.entrust.com>
To: "'edsimon@xmlsec.com'" <edsimon@xmlsec.com>, www-xkms-ws@w3c.org
Hi Ed,

You caught us! We used the "XML Encryption Requirements" document as a
template for ours. We can definitely correct the reference to Encryption in
the first sentence.

We can discuss the exact coordination requirements on the conference call.
But I would certainly appreciate if you looked at the XKMS requirements
relative to XML Encryption.

Cheers,
Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: edsimon@xmlsec.com [mailto:edsimon@xmlsec.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:46 PM
> To: www-xkms-ws@w3c.org
> Subject: RE: XKMS requirements - initial draft
> 
> 
> The XKMS Requirements state:
> 
> 6. Coordination
> The XML Encryption specification should meet the requirements 
> of (so as
> to support) or work with the following applications: 
>   W3C XML Signature 
>   W3C XML Encryption <---------------- Isn't this redundant here?, Ed
>   W3C XML Protocol 
>   Oasis XML-Based Security Services TC (SSTC) 
> 
> To ensure the above requirements are adequately addressed, 
> the XML Key Management
> specification must be reviewed by a designated member of the 
> following communities:
> 
>   XML Signature WG 
>   XML Encryption WG 
>   XML Protocol 
>   XML Schema WG 
>   XML Core WG 
>   Internationalization IG 
> 
> Regarding the first part, I've already indicated my interest 
> in participating
> in whatever effort is needed to ensure that XML Encryption 
> works well with
> XML Protocol (and XML Signature).
> 
> Regarding the second part, I volunteer, as a member of the 
> XML Encryption
> and XML Signature WGs, to be a designated reviewer of XKMS.
> 
> Ed
> 
> -- Original Message --
> 
> >All,
> >
> >Here is a first attempt at documenting XML Key Management 
> requirements.
> 
> >We
> >attempted to include requirements from a variety of sources, 
> including
> the
> >position papers and minutes from the July workshop, the 
> activity proposal
> >and proposed charter, and comments from the XKMS developer list.
> >
> >This should provide a good basis for discussion during the 
> conference call
> >next Thursday.
> >Comments sent to the list before then would be appreciated as well.
> >
> >Frederick Hirsch
> >Mike Just
> >
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------
> Ed Simon
> XMLsec Inc.
> 
> Interested in XML Security Training and Consulting services?  
> Visit "www.xmlsec.com".
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2001 09:06:50 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 13:51:41 EDT