> - I'd still like to see the non-normative doc on use in WAP > dropped Strongly agree. > - Under XML Schema it says "The serialization functionality > developed by the XML Protocol WG will be based on XML Schema". This > doesn't belong here and, in any event, doesn't seem relevant. And it's wrong, too. :) > - Is the description of ebXML correct, seems to pre-date the > movement of the work to OASIS? ebXML is in the process of moving is perhaps the best way to put it. PArts are already there, parts are waiting for UN/CEFACT to act.Received on Friday, 17 August 2001 22:00:05 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 13:51:38 EDT