W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-wsa-comments@w3.org > February 2003

[ISSUES] Issue #7 - proposed resolution

From: <Daniel_Austin@grainger.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 15:21:43 -0600
To: dmh@contivo.com, hugo@w3.org, Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com, Tom_Carroll@grainger.com, www-ws-arch@w3.org, www-wsa-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFA08745D6.22D51C0D-ON86256CC2.007552DC@grainger.com>

Greetings,

      Per my action item from the previous f2f meeting, I have an action
item to propose a resolution for issue #7 [1]. This proposal is intended to
comply with the WSA Issues Process [2].

      Issues #7-12 are all from a single email from Joseph Reagle
(reagle@w3c.org). An individual email response will be crafted for each
individual issue in accordance with the Issues Process [2].

<original comment>
                                                                                                       -----------------|
 3.2.1 Top-level                                                                                      |                 |
 Goals                                                                                                |                 |
                                                                                                      |                 |
                                                                                                      |                 |
 The Working                                                                                          |                 |
 Group has                                                                                            |                 |
 determined that                                                                                      |                 |
 at the highest                                                                                       |                 |
 level, its goals                                                                                     |                 |
 can be divided                                                                                       |                 |
 into 6                                                                                               |                 |
 categories. Each                                                                                     |                 |
 of these is                                                                                          |                 |
 associated with                                                                                      |                 |
 the CSFs and                                                                                         |                 |
 requirements                                                                                         |                 |
 listed in                                                                                            |                 |
 [47]section                                                                                          |                 |
 3.2.2                                                                                                |                 |
                                                                                                      |                 |
                                                                                                      |                 |
 While it might                                                                                       |                 |
 be implied that                                                                                      |                 |
 these goals will                                                                                     |                 |
 be further                                                                                           |                 |
 expounded upon                                                                                       |                 |
 in 3.2.2, it                                                                                         |                 |
 might be useful                                                                                      |                 |
 to state this.                                                                                       |                 |
                                                                                                       -----------------|



</original comment>

<proposed response>
Dear Mr. Reagle,

      Thank you very much for your comment to the WSA Working Group. We
very much appreciate your time and effort in sending us this comment. Your
comment has been added to the WSA Issues List [1] and will be resolved
according to the WSA Issues process [2]. In your email, there were several
comments, which have been assigned issue IDs #7-12. Each of these comments
has be scheduled to be addressed individually.

      The editors of the WSA Requirements document concur with your
statement that it would be useful to indicate explicitly that CSFs and
requirements in section 3.2.1 will be further elaborated in section 3.2.2.
This change will take place prior to the next publication of the document.
Again, thank you for your comment.

Regards,

D-

</proposed response>


[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/2/issues/wsa-issues.html

[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/2/04/wd-wsa-issues-process-20020426


*************************************************
Dr. Daniel Austin
Sr. Technical Architect / Architecture Team Lead
daniel_austin@notes.grainger.com <----- Note change!
847 793 5044
Visit http://www.grainger.com
Received on Monday, 3 February 2003 16:21:43 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 13:51:26 EDT