Hi, I've been reading the spec and I found something quirky in the section 3.2with respect to wsa:RelatesTo usage. The sample response message described in the document contains two wsa:RelatesTo attributes <s:Envelope ...> <s:Header ...> <wsa:Action>...</wsa:Action> <wsa:MessageID>xs:anyURI</wsa:MessageID> <wsa:RelatesTo>xs:anyURI</wsa:RelatesTo> ? <wsa:RelatesTo>messageID from GetMessage</wsa:RelatesTo> <wsa:To>...</wsa:To> .... </s:Header> <s:Body ...> .... </s:Body> </s:Envelope> The first one is OPTIONAL and the second MUST be present. I think there is very confusing to distinguish between them, since multiple WS stacks use the RelatesTo element to match the response message for a pending response, having two will force the stack to look twice for the message. I think that it will be very valuable to add a RelationshipType attribute to the RelatesTo element that represents the message id of the original message, with a value that allows to distinguish between them. Regards, Diego Gonzalez Lagash Systems SA PS: Is this the correct mailing list to discuss about this submission?Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2005 21:10:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:50 GMT