W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws@w3.org > October 2003

DAML-S/OWL-S comments and questions

From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:24:03 +0200
Message-ID: <56512F1841F5E846879EE0D9F858D20F64E2FC@RZJC1EX.jr1.local>
To: <www-ws@w3.org>


 Good morning DAML-S community!

 I recently read the DAML-S drafts-and I am deeply impressed.
 Thanx for the work done yet, because that's IMHO exactly what we need
 to get the SW up and running. Nevertheless I got some comments on the 
 drafts and the DAML-S web site, I'd like to share:

 1. Just some organisational matter: the OWL-S 1.0 draft only shows up
on
    the community archive/publicationa page. Is this on purpose?

 2. A newbie question: In the 0.9 DAML-S draft, section 5.1 the example
    for the unordered control construct does not make sense to me.
    Shouldn't there be Z = (Unordered X Y) instead of Z = (Unordered A
B),
    or did I miss something?

 3. Are there any trust building functions or access constraint
mechanisms 
    (security facets I miss, or did I leave out some documents
describing it)
    in DAML-S/OWL-S?
 
 4. And last but not least: If I like to contribute to the current work,
is there
    a need in any area (programmatically, semantics, research), i.e. is
input desired?

 Ok. That's it for today-hope there will be a response;)

 Sincerely yours

 Michael

--------------------------------------------------------------------
  Michael Hausenblas
  Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
  JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
  Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA

  phone:  +43-316-876-1135                   fax: +43-316-876-1191
  web:    http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
  e-mail: mailto:michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2003 04:26:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:44 GMT