W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws@w3.org > May 2003

RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services

From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 11:13:50 -0400
Message-ID: <9A4FC925410C024792B85198DF1E97E405C6E79B@usmsg03.sagus.com>
To: www-ws@w3.org



> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of
> Mark Baker
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 9:47 AM
> To: Anne Thomas Manes
> Cc: www-ws@w3.org; noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
> Subject: Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services
> 
> 

> 
> Hardcoded intermediaries are valuable, so long as they're 
> hardcoded to a
> generic application; the more generic the application, the 
> more valuable
> the intermediary. 

Sigh, OK, so this has been a word-game: "hardcoded intermediaries" are what
we all think of as HTTP-aware firewalls/proxies/caches/etc., because you
think of the Web as a single "application."  You can understand how this
confuses those of us who think of the Web as infrastructure upon which
millions of applications are built!
Received on Tuesday, 27 May 2003 11:14:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:42 GMT