W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws@w3.org > May 2003

Re: Explaining visibility, take 54

From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 10:42:15 -0400
To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, www-ws@w3.org
Message-id: <oprowtspg2ezizxn@smtp.comcast.net>

On Fri, 9 May 2003 08:25:29 -0400, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org> wrote:

> A.  A generic SOAP/XML intermediary
> B.  An intermediary hardcoded to the WSDL document above
> C.  An intermediary hardcoded to some other WSDL document
> I suggest that B has vastly superior visibility to A or C.

Uhh, OK, but what's the point?  An intermediary by definition is a "3rd 
party" component that doesn't understand the application-specific data 
format (such as that WSDL describes), so "B" and "C" are oxymorons.

Mike Champion
Received on Friday, 9 May 2003 10:45:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:37:08 UTC