W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws@w3.org > July 2003

Re: has_process

From: David Martin <martin@AI.SRI.COM>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:11:37 -0700
Message-ID: <3F219D09.3000405@ai.sri.com>
To: David Martin <martin@AI.SRI.COM>
CC: Jan Ortmann <j.ort@web.de>, www-ws@w3.org



David Martin wrote:
> Jan Ortmann wrote:
> 
>> Hi all.
>> If I am not mistaken,  the has_process-Property in Profile should 
>> refer to ProcessPowerSet in Process not simply to Process itself, 
>> otherwise it would require an instance of Process. 
> 
> 
> Thanks, Jan.  You are correct, and we will correct this in the current 
> release.
> 
> Actually, we may also deprecate this property in Profile.  It is 
> potentially confusing for a profile to point to a specific process, 
> because a profile is allowed to represent multiple processes.  

Please disregard the comment I made just above; it was incorrect.  It 
doesn't actually make sense for a profile to be associated with multiple 
processes.

An
> association between a profile and a particular process is more correctly 
> represented in an instance of the Service class.

- David
Received on Friday, 25 July 2003 17:09:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:43 GMT