Re: has_process

David Martin wrote:
> Jan Ortmann wrote:
> 
>> Hi all.
>> If I am not mistaken,  the has_process-Property in Profile should 
>> refer to ProcessPowerSet in Process not simply to Process itself, 
>> otherwise it would require an instance of Process. 
> 
> 
> Thanks, Jan.  You are correct, and we will correct this in the current 
> release.
> 
> Actually, we may also deprecate this property in Profile.  It is 
> potentially confusing for a profile to point to a specific process, 
> because a profile is allowed to represent multiple processes.  

Please disregard the comment I made just above; it was incorrect.  It 
doesn't actually make sense for a profile to be associated with multiple 
processes.

An
> association between a profile and a particular process is more correctly 
> represented in an instance of the Service class.

- David