W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws@w3.org > February 2003

Re: DAML-S ProfileHierarchy example

From: David Martin <martin@ai.sri.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 22:31:37 -0800
Message-ID: <3E420149.ED42C5C3@ai.sri.com>
To: Vera Zaychik <vzaychik@atl.lmco.com>
CC: www-ws@w3.org

Vera -

Vera Zaychik wrote:

> I am somewhat confused about one of the examples. It seems to me that
> the DAML-S ProfileHierarchy ontology is not valid DAML. In particular,
> it uses 'daml:toValue' property, which does not exist. Was this supposed
> to be 'hasValue' instead?

Thank you (belatedly) for pointing this out.  Yes, hasValue is correct, and
I've just changed it on the Web site.

> Also, it uses daml:domain and daml:range for
> some reason instead of rdfs:domain and rdfs:range.

Either way is OK - because the DAML+OIL spec:


uses samePropertyAs to declare equivalence of daml:domain with rdfs:domain,
and similarly for range.

David Martin

> Can somebody clear this issue up for me? Thanks,
> Vera Zaychik
> Lockheed Martin ATL
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2003 01:32:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:37:08 UTC