W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws@w3.org > August 2003

RE: [OWL-S] arguments for PAI and PAC

From: Dickinson, Ian J <Ian.Dickinson@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:14:09 +0100
Message-ID: <5E13A1874524D411A876006008CD059F05F81696@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: "'David Martin'" <martin@AI.SRI.COM>
Cc: "'www-ws@w3.org'" <www-ws@w3.org>

David Martin wrote:
> Oh, and I should add - we (the DAML-S Coalition) just recently had a 
> vote on this, and we have decided to move from PAC to PAI.  
> This will be 
> reflected in the next release of OWL-S (assuming no contravening 
> decisions are made in the meantime, which I think is unlikely :-).
That's great news, David.  I've long thought of PAC as an uncomfortable
design choice.  Do you have any timetable for the next release of OWL-S?
Just a rough idea, I'm not seeking a binding commitment!


Ian Dickinson, HP Labs, Bristol, UK              ian.dickinson@hp.com
+44 (117) 312 8796                http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/ijd
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2003 05:38:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:37:09 UTC