RE: DAML-S and UDDI

Anne, 
 The research on DAML-S matchmaker and UDDI was and is being done at
Carnegie Mellon University by my research group.
 Yes, we will be interested in submitting this paper (with additional
information) to the OASIS UDDI. We also have an implementation that is
available from our softagents page.
  Cheers, 
  --Katia Sycara
  

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of
Anne Thomas Manes
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 11:21 AM
To: Terry R. Payne; 'Jeff Lansing'; www-ws@w3c.org; Uddi-Spec
Subject: Re: DAML-S and UDDI


Terry,

Would your group be interested in submitting this paper to the OASIS
UDDI-Spec TC?

Anne

----- Original Message -----
From: "Terry R. Payne" <trp@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: "'Jeff Lansing'" <jeff@polexis.com>; <www-ws@w3c.org>
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 12:13 PM
Subject: RE: DAML-S and UDDI


>
> Yes.  Will get back to you on the rest of your question, but for now,
> check out:
>
> Importing the Semantic Web in UDDI
>
> Paolucci, M. and Kawamura, T. and Payne, T.R. and Sycara, K. (2002)
> Importing the Semantic Web in UDDI. In Bussler, C. and Hull, R. and
> McIlraith, S. and Orlowska, M.E. and Pernici, B. and Yang, J., Eds.
> Proceedings Web Services, E-Business and Semantic Web Workshop, CAiSE
> 2002., pages 225-236, Toronto, Canada.
>
> http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/archive/00007778/
>
>
> Terry
>
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________
> Terry R. Payne, PhD.      | http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~trp/index.html
> University of Southampton | Voice: +44(0)23 8059 8343 [Fax: 8059 2865]
> Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK | Email: terry@acm.org / trp@ecs.soton.ac.uk
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: www-ws-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-request@w3.org] On Behalf
> Of
> > Jeff Lansing
> > Sent: 01 August 2003 17:07
> > To: www-ws@w3c.org
> > Subject: DAML-S and UDDI
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Has anyone proposed a mapping for storing DAML-S in a UDDI registry?
> Or
> > is this just a totally bad idea, that I haven't seen why it is such,
> yet?
> >
> > My thought was: Hey, if web services is UDDI + SOAP + WSDL (and,
> > implicitly, if you believe the hype, that's all it is), and we know
> that
> > you can't even begin to figure out what a service does from its
WSDL,
> > then why not.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
>
>

Received on Friday, 1 August 2003 13:10:17 UTC