W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws@w3.org > August 2003


From: Katia Sycara <katia@cs.cmu.edu>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 13:04:56 -0400
To: "'Jeff Lansing'" <jeff@polexis.com>, www-ws@w3c.org
Cc: katia@cs.cmu.edu
Message-ID: <002101c3584f$08ec4b30$d6dc0280@katiamobile2>

Jeff, in my lab at CMU, besides publications like the one Terry referred
you to, we  have an implementation of a DAML-S matchmaker integrated
with UDDI.
 Please check www.cs.cmu.edu/~softagents under Semantic web research, in
particular Daml-s matching engine. 

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of
Jeff Lansing
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 11:07 AM
To: www-ws@w3c.org
Subject: DAML-S and UDDI


Has anyone proposed a mapping for storing DAML-S in a UDDI registry? Or 
is this just a totally bad idea, that I haven't seen why it is such,

My thought was: Hey, if web services is UDDI + SOAP + WSDL (and, 
implicitly, if you believe the hype, that's all it is), and we know that

you can't even begin to figure out what a service does from its WSDL, 
then why not.

Received on Friday, 1 August 2003 13:05:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:37:09 UTC