W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws@w3.org > October 2002

DAML-S and WSDL vs. a uniform interface

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:45:14 -0400
To: www-ws@w3.org
Message-ID: <20021021114514.J13534@www.markbaker.ca>

Greetings,

Since DAML-S 0.5, I've been trying to wrap my ahead around it using the
examples, without any luck.  It would help me to see some examples of
*network messages* (aka "on the wire") that would be used to implement
those examples.

In DAML-S 0.7, I just found a paper[1] on how to describe Web services
using both DAML-S and WSDL.  Since I know how WSDL maps to messages -
operations in a WSDL document become the semantics of the messages that
are sent - I can for the first time see what a DAML-S message looks
like.  But, as with Web services, I don't like what I see, because it's
not using a uniform interface[2], like the Web does.

So is this an issue with DAML-S itself, or just with this DAML-S/WSDL
integration?  Can DAML-S work with a uniform interface (GET, POST, PUT,
etc..)?

Thanks.

 [1] http://www.daml.org/services/daml-s/0.7/daml-s-wsdl.html
 [2] http://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/pubs/dissertation/rest_arch_style.htm#sec_5_1_5

MB
-- 
Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile.  Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.
http://www.markbaker.ca             http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 11:43:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:40 GMT