DAML-S ProfileHierarchy example

I am somewhat confused about one of the examples. It seems to me that
the DAML-S ProfileHierarchy ontology is not valid DAML. In particular,
it uses 'daml:toValue' property, which does not exist. Was this supposed
to be 'hasValue' instead? Also, it uses daml:domain and daml:range for
some reason instead of rdfs:domain and rdfs:range.

Can somebody clear this issue up for me? Thanks,
Vera Zaychik
Lockheed Martin ATL

Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2002 13:32:06 UTC