W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws@w3.org > May 2002

Re: DAML-S 0.6 Whitepaper

From: Sheila McIlraith <sam@KSL.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 11:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200205121813.LAA24053@poco.Stanford.EDU>
To: benhood@gmx.net, www-ws@w3.org

Ben,

http://www.daml.org/services/daml-s/2001/10/survey-f-release.pdf

is simply a section of the DAML-S 0.6 whitepaper.  The citation
is:

  DAML-S 0.6 Whitepaper,
  DAML Services Coalition: A. Ankolekar,  M. Burstein, J. Hobbs, O. Lassila,  
  D. Martin,  D. McDermott, S. McIlraith, S. Narayanan, M. Paolucci, 
  T. Payne, K. Sycara, H. Zeng.
  http://www.daml.org/services/daml-s/2001/10/
  October 10, 2001.

The DAML-S ontology complements much of the work on communication-level
Web service description languages.  The section in our white paper is
a little out of date.  I would recommend that you also look at

  The DAML Services Coalition (alphabetically Anupriya Ankolenkar, 
  Mark Burstein, Jerry R. Hobbs, Ora Lassila, David L. Martin, 
  Drew McDermott, Sheila A. McIlraith, Srini Narayanan, Massimo Paolucci, 
  Terry R. Payne and Katia Sycara), 
  "DAML-S: Web Service Description for the Semantic Web", 
  to appear in The First International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), 
  June, 2002. 

  The paper can be accessed from http://www.daml.org/services/



> Hallo,
> 
> I was wondering if were possible to re-render the "Relationship to Existing
> Industry Web Services Efforts" Paper attached to the DAML-S 0.6 Whitepaper
> (http://www.daml.org/services/daml-s/2001/10/survey-f-release.pdf), so that it
> is citable? (Title, Author for example).
> 
> I feel that this imformation is important if you are trying to put the
> DAML-S Specification in Context with other efforts.
> 
> Ben Hood


Regards,

Sheila McIlraith
Received on Sunday, 12 May 2002 14:13:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:40 GMT