W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws@w3.org > June 2002

Re: DAML-S and the UDDI initiative

From: Massimo Paolucci <paolucci@icarus.cimds.ri.cmu.edu>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 11:13:53 -0400
Message-ID: <15612.55601.675520.736849@icarus.cimds.ri.cmu.edu>
To: Erik Hellman <Erik.Hellman@bth.se>
Cc: www-ws@w3.org

Erik Hellman writes:
 > Hi!
 > This is a simple question that might result in a quite long answer. ;)

I will try to give you a short answer to your good questions.


There is no direct connection between UDDI and DAML-S, so you will not
find anywhere in their documents references to one or the other.
Nevertheless,  there is an encoding of DAML-S Profiles into UDDI
records, such an encoding is described in [1].  Using that encoding
you can register DAML-S descriptions as UDDI records in UDDI.

Also, soon we will release a DAML-S registry that will use the
semantic matching capabilities of DAML-S [2] to enhance UDDI.  The
registry is under development, but the first version will be out

A DAML-S API for DAML-S based on Jena will hopefully available by the
end of the month.  It is currently under test.

Let me know if you have additional questions,

--- Massimo

[1] M. Paolucci, T. Kawamura, T. R. Payne, K. Sycara
    Importing the Semantic Web in UDDI

[2] Massimo Paolucci, Takahiro Kawamura, Terry R. Payne, Katia Sycara;
    "Semantic Matching of Web Services Capabilities." Forthcoming in Proceedings
    of the 1st International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2002) 
    available from http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~softagents/publications.html

 > Since I started working with Web Services, the only tools, APIs and
 > platforms available are only focused on the standards presented by UDDI.
 > They use SOAP for communication, WSDL for integration and UDDI for
 > discovery (basically). Where will DAML-S fit in to all of this? I have
 > only found one Java API for DAML (Jena from HP) and none of the other
 > software vendors even mention the existance of DAML-S anywhere. Is
 > DAML-S supposed to be an alternative to the UDDI approach or is there
 > any work on integrating the two standards in progress? 
 > The reason I'm asking is that I am about to decide if I should use
 > DAML-S in my more advanced discovery mechanism or whether I should
 > focuson the once (less complex) presented by UDDI.
 > Regards,
 > Erik Hellman
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2002 11:14:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:37:07 UTC