- From: Amit Bhatiani <amit@invertica.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 20:49:19 -0400
- To: <www-ws@w3.org>
Hugo Haas said: >I personnally think that describing semantics of the service at the >same time as its operation makes sense. 1. http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-wsdl-20010315#_documentation 2. http://www.w3.org/2001/03/WSWS-popa/paper51 I agree with you on describing semantics (and in fact transactional semantics if needed) as first class objects in WSDL along side descriptions. I just don't think that "meaning of methods" and semantics of web services are interchangeable terms. The web service might have semantics that are defined at multi-method level only and not at each method. In fact, some methods might make no sense to call unless others are called before/after. Method signatures should also be included along with invariants, but is that the same as WS Semantics? ______________________________ 212-571-4103 x 6590 (w) 201-759-4158 (m) 212-571-3588 (f) Invertica Inc. www.invertica.com
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2001 20:46:54 UTC