W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2007

RE: Possible erratum candidates

From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:46:56 -0700
To: "'Jean-Jacques Moreau'" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: "'www-ws-desc'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <01fa01c7722a$3f02f5e0$bd08e1a0$@com>

These are all in Bugzilla now:

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&order=releva
nce+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=WSDL&content=

I only had time to add a few proposed resolutions to the few that didn't
imply one.

- 4227, 4431, 4436  are editorial but need a proposed resolution.
- 4225, 4430, 4432 require more investigation.

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Jean-Jacques Moreau
> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 9:43 AM
> To: WSD Private
> Subject: Possible erratum candidates
> 
> As per my action item, I've extracted from my earlier annotated
> versions of Part 1 & Part 2 possible erratum candidates. Specifically,
> I've trimmed down the Word document to show only the incriminated
> sentences/paragraphs.
> 
> Jonathan, would you fancy adding them to Bugzilla, using the format
> that you think is most suitable?
> 
> JJ.
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2007 17:47:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:46 GMT